The 2-Minute Rule for dive watches under 200



Today, talking about sub clocks means pointing directly to a class of timepieces that is normally used for even ten per cent of its possible.

What good is it to possess the best, which for him to dive to over 1,000 meters of thickness would be as easy as "drinking a glass of water", if the individual has fastened his wrist to the max following a dip and a couple of strokes, then return instantly to lounge under the umbrella?

If this is their principal use, it is merely the fault of old habits at least as far as the introduction of the so-called divers of the contemporary age that dates back to the center of the previous century.



The incorrigible desire to be the protagonist of the best diving watches

Three years later, in 1953, Blancpain devised the Fifty Fathoms, among the most iconic timepieces the category can boast, has been already tied to Jacques-Yves Cousteau's wrist to battle the depths of the well-identified abysses in "The Silent World", a famous documentary -movie additionally winner of the Oscar award.

Continuing, I believe that even non-fans will remember well among the very first Rolex Submariner appear several times with Sean Connery, Agent 007 in the movie Goldfinger shot of 1964. Tied into his wrist turned into a legend. It was a mythical reference 6538 no-guard, to understand each other with no crown shield shoulders, imitated a little by everybody.

These are only two of the very first cases that reveal how - fiction or fact - for more than fifty years the media - driven by the watch sector - determined that the diver watches ought to be the very first to personify the concept of man-adventure. Maybe it's also from that day the manufacturers when it came to describing their models started to use the phrase: "suitable for any event".



The 007 change, unfortunately also the mythical "Mr. Q "- the inventor of all of the mechanisms of the most well-known spy on earth, and obviously also the opinion whose function has been played with the Omega Seamaster for many years.

But beyond their real use in this large family whose origins would simply deal with "hard even more than steel", now there are also versions so bejeweled to dread even once you have to wash the palms.

But a true diver's view has normally always had a lot to say technically talking. Let us just mention the characteristics and constructive characteristics of those fascinating references.



I've a long-standing friend who is an expert diver and who, during his diving at the Persian Gulf, makes 100% of his diving watch - like that valve to get the escape of gaseous mixtures that are breathed at large depths.

A real wrist sub Has to Be able to ensure the following performances:

Fantastic visibility during the dive

A defense against magnetic fields superior to the standard

Resistance to salt and impact water

Accurate verification of the operation of the more info system that reports the dive time

An in-depth evaluation of the efficiency of its movement, either quartz or mechanical



But the tests didn't end here: now professional diving watches must adhere to certain rules more info such as the ones described by ISO 6425.

For a common mortal use, that which we all know get more info is the best, the best sub could be ultimately a watchable to provide features considerably milder and easier to handle.
I remember that in order to simply immerse the surface at maximum safety, a timepiece ought to be certified to withstand a pressure of at least 5 ATM (approximately 50 meters), which seems to be redundant, but this isn't so when it is done a trivial swim in the sea. It'd be better to avoid diving, particularly if ours couldn't even count to a screw-on crown, better still when protected on the sides by the classic two shoulders.

Along with the safety on the watertight status of the underwater timepieces?

Just for those who'd never use them for specialist purposes the ideal would be to have the ability to rely on a device that visually signals about the dial in case the crown isn't completely screwed, and the watch is consequently in a clear state of non-security.

Sadly, this really is the primary reason why an abyssal super dip watch might need to be rushed to a service centre, before seawater entering risks virtually any mechanism indefinitely. This function already exists, however on hardly any models, which honestly I do not understand why.

You might have worn your diving diver's watch in your wrist in order to visit the sea and as a result, after correcting the time, have left to twist the crown tightly. It's by far the most frequent case.

Suggestion - As soon as you've worn the costume decide on the fly either leave your diver someplace safe, or obligatorily create a final but basic check on the tightening of the winding crown.



Now that we've seen together a little 'of problems linked to the time that must satisfy with the water, and also given the necessary advice, I reveal you that - so far - are for me the best dive watches.

They are not many: I've divided them into two classes. The order in which they appear doesn't represent any position.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

Comments on “The 2-Minute Rule for dive watches under 200”

Leave a Reply

Gravatar